Yesterday I was
watching TV when a story appears
(T) about censorship of art, denoting exhibitions
that have taken place in times of "democracy" (in 1990) These have been
highly controversial because they have exposed from fetuses (replicas) photographs of dead babies
replicating what was the popular tradition "el velorio del angelito" with
current prospects and, of course, plays focused on homosexuality,
dictatorship, genocide, among others.
In this sense, the
reporter was says that until the end of
(V) dictatorship there was a state agency called "tribunal
calificador", who check the movies, expositions
(WW) and plays arrived or presents in Chile and defined what yes and
what no, even
become to prohibit the (WF) "The Last
Temptation of Christ" movie in Chile (P) based in the moral and good
customs of the society, i.e. (?)
the catholic and cristians (S)
values of the correct, not sinful and and
(WF) that wasn’t a moral failure
wing (WE).
In diagnostic mode,
since (V) colonization and domination
from the XVII and XVIII centuries in Latin America there have been various
control mechanisms in political, ideological and social terms, denoting certain
ways of relating to an "other", certain public policies and certain
forms control of identity /cultural aspects of the "other” for dominate.
In this context the
art, since much time, has been used as the most expressive forms of identity
from all cultural groups, and also, (V) gestated as one of the areas where the
cultural control is consolidated. Situations like I described in the beginning
have been generated through processes of cultural domination exercised not only
in times of dictatorship (70’ or 80’) where political censorship was
apprehensive, but since the early domination as an aspect to define, monitor
and take from one class over another through their essential: the identity.
In this (WF) therms (WW), the fight
also run to this way: the fight for our identity.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario